Example of Item Analysis

This example uses the MathScienceTest.jmp sample data table, which is a subset of the data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) conducted in 1996. The data table contains scores (1 = correct or 0 = incorrect) for 1263 students on 14 questions. You examine the first four questions to understand the relationship between questions and respondent’s mathematical ability. The questions on the test are the items that are used to measure the latent mathematical ability. Fit a 2PL model to this data.

Select Help > Sample Data Library and open MathScienceTest.jmp.

Select Analyze > Multivariate Methods > Item Analysis.

Select Q1 through Q4, click Y, Test Items and click OK.

Figure 9.2 Item Response Report

From the dual plot you note that Q4 is the easiest of the four questions to answer as it has the lowest difficulty score at -1.78. Q3 is the hardest with a difficulty score of 0.46. Most of the respondents fall in the middle to lower end of the ability scale as shown by the data points in the center part of the graph. In the histogram, you can see that approximately 40% of the respondents fall slightly above zero on the ability scale.

Note: Ability scores are not computed for individuals with all incorrect or all correct answers. For more information, see Fitting the IRT Model.

Click on the gray Characteristic Curves report disclosure icon to open.

Click the Item Analysis red triangle menu, and select Number of Plots Across.

Enter 2 and click OK.

Click on the gray Information Plot report disclosure icon to open.

Figure 9.3 Item Response Example

Q1 has a flat characteristic curve and a flat information curve. This suggests that Q1 does not provide much information to discriminate respondents’ mathematical ability. The characteristic curve for Q2 is steep, which indicates that Q2 is useful for discriminating respondent ability. The vertical line in each plot is at the inflection point for the characteristic curve. This vertical line is the ability level at which the respondent has a 50% probability of answering the specified question correctly.

The information plot indicates that together the four questions analyzed provide the most information about ability levels between about -1 and 0. Including more questions of higher difficulty in the model could broaden the information curve.